Conserving Forest Bird Populations
Through Citizen Science
BY Rick Bonney and Ron Rohrbaugh
Please
cite this Page as:
Bonney, R. and Rohrbaugh,
R. 2000. Conserving Forest Bird Populations Through Citizen Science. Birdscope,
Volume 14, Number 1: 1-3.
Project Tanager yields the first in a series of management guidelines
for preserving bird habitat
The Conservation Science program at the Cornell Lab of Ornithology recently published
the first in a series of habitat management guidelines designed to help land managers and
owners manage and protect habitat for birds. A Land Managers Guide to Improving
Habitat for Scarlet Tanagers and other Forest-interior Birds rolled off the presses
this past December, offering specific habitat management guidelines resulting from one of
the Labs first citizen-science projects, Project Tanager. The publication of these
guidelines shows how effectively citizen-science projects can contribute directly to bird
conservation, but more importantly, the guidelines provide land managers with
science-based recommendations that they can use immediately.
As the preface of the 24-page booklet explains, these guidelines are written for two
types of land managers: those responsible for large landscapes, such as public lands or
entire states, and private landowners who manage small blocks of forest. The booklet first
discusses the general concept of forest fragmentation-the process by which large,
contiguous forests are broken into small parcels by agriculture, logging, or development.
Scientists have known for some time that fragmentation can severely reduce the ability of
a forest to support healthy breeding populations of many bird species, so the booklet
offers general guidelines for managing forests to benefit many forest-interior birds.
These general guidelines include preventing the fragmentation of large forest tracts,
minimizing the creation of edge habitats, establishing forested corridors to reduce
isolation of small patches, and maintaining structural and plant-species diversity within
existing forests.
Then, the booklet focuses specifically on the habitat-area requirements of the Scarlet
Tanager. Because habitat requirements for this species vary geographically,
recommendations are tailored to conditions in different regions of the tanagers
range. Four Regional Profiles provide a map and description of available
forest types, Project Tanager results showing forest types used by Scarlet Tanagers,
estimates of the amount of mature forest required to sustain breeding Scarlet Tanagers,
and a regional summary that briefly presents the most important management strategies for
that location. This regional approach provides land managers with information that will be
directly applicable to their own areas.
Central to each profile are Minimum Area Tables. These tables have several
uses, for example, predicting the impacts that proposed management actions or land-use
changes will have on the suitability of habitat for breeding tanagers or determining the
degree of reforestation needed to increase the likelihood of attracting tanagers to a
forest patch. The tables must be used carefully and correctly, however, because the
suitability of any given forest patch for supporting tanagers depends not only on the size
of the patch but also on the amount of forest remaining in the surrounding landscape, as
well as the distance from the patch to the nearest forest of at least 100 acres. For
example, a 20-acre woodlot may be unlikely to support tanagers if it is surrounded by
agricultural land, but a similar woodlot located close to a large, extensively forested
park may be almost as likely to support tanagers as the park itself. Indeed, the
complexity of the relationship between tanagers and their habitats is one of the key
findings of Project Tanager.
This table indicates the minimum area required to provide high-, moderate-, or
low-suitability habitat for Scarlet Tanagers in the Midwest region. High-suitability
habitats have the same probability of supporting breeding tanagers as unfragmented
forests, whereas moderate- and low-suitability habitats are respectively 25 percent and 50
percent less likely to support tanagers than an unfragmented forest.
|
| Percentage
of |
|
Minimum
area(acres)required for: |
| forest
in 2,500-acre block |
High |
Moderate |
Low |
| 70 |
66 |
11 |
1 |
| 60 |
141 |
23 |
3 |
| 50 |
292 |
47 |
6 |
| 40 |
605 |
97 |
12 |
| 30 |
NA* |
208 |
27 |
| 20 |
NA* |
481 |
62 |
| 10 |
NA* |
NA* |
173 |
|
|
|
|
*Not
availableacreage values exceed the amount of forest in the 2,500-acre block |
|
Why did
the Lab choose the Scarlet Tanager for its first forest-bird project and first set of
habitat guidelines? First, this conspicuous species represents a whole community of
forest-dwelling Neotropical migratory birds. Scarlet Tanagers are part of a community of
species that share similar habitat requirements and geographical distributions. By meeting
the needs of Scarlet Tanagers, land managers also will be improving habitat for dozens of
other forest-dwelling birds.
Second, although Scarlet Tanager populations are stable in many areas, the species is
still vulnerable, because much of its population is concentrated in forests in the
northeastern United States and eastern Canada. Also, the best time to begin protecting a
species is while it still is common. For these reasons, the tanager served as an excellent
pilot species for the Labs first continentwide study of forest birds. And now,
through Birds in Forested Landscapes, the original tanager protocols have been extended to
include forest thrushes and accipiter hawks. Guidelines for these and other species will
be prepared in the future.
Improving Habitat for Scarlet Tanagers and other Forest-interior Birds was
written by several Lab staff: Ken Rosenberg, Ron Rohrbaugh, Sara Barker, Jim Lowe, Stefan
Hames, and André Dhondt. Single copies are available free of charge to all participants
in Project Tanager: call the number in the box below to receive one in the mail. For
nonparticipants, copies are available for $5.00, which covers the cost of printing and
mailing. In an effort to further the Labs mission of bird conservation, state and
federal agencies and other groups that are responsible for managing large amounts of
forest will be provided with complimentary copies of the booklet. The booklet will also be
available in electronic form at the Labs web site.
We thank the National Science Foundation, National Fish and Wildlife Foundation,
Partners in Flight, Archie and Grace Berry Charitable Foundation, Florence and John
Schumann Foundation, Packard Foundation, and each participant in Project Tanager for the
funding, data, and general support they provided to Project Tanager and for production of
this new publication.
Ground-testing
Citizen Science with Project Tanager
Studying
range-wide effects of landscape features and habitat fragmentation on widespread species
such as Scarlet Tanagers is not simple. In fact, no single researcher or team of
researchers could adequately cover enough territory during a short breeding season to
conduct such a study. For this reason, in 1993 the Lab of Ornithology developed Project
Tanager, a partnership between amateur birders and professional scientists, with support
from the National Science Foundation and the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation. By
employing this volunteer, citizen-scientist work force, Cornell researchers could be
everywhere at once. From 1993 to 1996, more than 1,000 trained volunteers
studied tanagers at more than 2,000 study sites across North America, amassing perhaps the
largest data set ever collected on forest fragmentation and its effect on birds.
Project Tanager participants followed a simple but rigorously tested
protocol that included selecting suitable study sites; visiting these sites at least twice
during the breeding season to search for tanagers and look for evidence of breeding;
measuring a suite of habitat variables; and returning data to Cornell for analysis. The
newly published Scarlet Tanager management guidelines are a direct result of this massive
study.
Rick Bonney and Ron Rorbaugh |
Return |