

























|

The Fragmented Forest
The Landscape Context
If all lands were managed to enhance local diversity by creating edges, diversity at a larger
regional scale might actually decline because area-sensitive species would disappear from the
larger landscape (Figure 5, below). As long as large habitat
blocks continue to be managed in this manner,
forest-interior species will continue to decline, leaving only
edge specialists; those birds that can tolerate
disturbance from predators, or those that reject
Brown-headed Cowbird eggs. One goal of current
conservation planning is to reach a balance between
supporting desirable edge species locally, while protecting
the regional and global populations of the more
vulnerable forest-interior birds. This is best accomplished
by considering the landscape context of local
forest patches.
A. Regional-sized forest (10,000+ acres) with some
natural fragmentation:
Local diversity is low because few edge species are present.
Regional diversity is high because region supports many area-sensitive species.
|
|
B. Regional forest becomes more fragmented:
Local diversity increases because edge species are added to fragmented areas.
Regional diversity remains nearly constant as gains in edge species offset losses of some
area-sensitive species.
|
|
C. Regional forest becomes extensively fragmented:
Local diversity remains constant, but edge species are distributed over a wider geographical
area.
Regional diversity declines because no new edge species are added, but many area-sensitive
species are lost.
|
|
|
Figure 5.
Thumbnail sketches of regional forest
show how increasing fragmentation leads to more
edge habitat and lowered, regional avian diversity.
Illustrations by Keila Sydenstricker.
|
More and more, land managers and conservationists are taking into account the importance
of managing habitat at large landscape scales
(Freemark et al. 1995). For example, the value of an
individual 100-acre (40 ha) woodlot to birds varies
greatly, depending on whether it is part of an
extensively forested landscape or the only woodlot for
miles. Similarly, decisions to fragment large forested
areas may be influenced by the importance of these areas
to regional bird populations. By managing habitat at
the landscape scale, managers can contribute to the
health of regional populations through their own local
actions on the ground. The forest-management guidelines
we provide below explicitly consider how landscape features such as amount of surrounding forest,
degree of isolation, and amount of edge affect the
suitability of mature forest habitats for one high-profile
focal species, the Scarlet Tanager.
 
|