In Latest Challenge, Researchers Stand by Ivory-bill Evidence
By Pat Leonard
In addition to sightings and possible audio recordings of Ivory-billed Woodpeckers in the Big Woods of Arkansas, the now-famous “Luneau video” has been a key element supporting the assertion that at least one Ivory-billed Woodpecker was present in April 2004. A peer-reviewed article challenging that conclusion has been published in the March 16 issue of Science. A response by Cornell Lab of Ornithology director Dr. John Fitzpatrick and colleagues is included in the same issue.
The challenge is led by David Sibley, renowned author of The Sibley Guide to Birds.
In
the article, Sibley and three coauthors claim the features of the bird
in the Luneau video do not eliminate the possibility of its being a
normal Pileated
Woodpecker. For example, they argue
that the
white seen on the
bird in the video as it flies away from the viewer is the large white
patch on the underwing of a pileated. They suggest that the wings
twist in such a way that the bottom surface of both wings are
visible and the top surface largely hidden. Fitzpatrick et al.
interpret this
same footage as showing extensive white on the top side of the bird,
conspicuous black wingtips, and the absence of black along the rear
edge of the wing—characteristic of an ivory-bill. They state that the
"wing-twisting" hypothesis
contradicts all models and photographic analyses of flapping flight in
birds.
Sibley et al. also claim that the perched bird, seen just
before launching into flight, is a Pileated Woodpecker with its wing
opened and extended vertically, thus also showing its large
white underwing patch. However, Fitzpatrick et al. interpret this same
portion of the video as a side view of an ivory-bill's wing as it
begins to open. The underwing of a Pileated Woodpecker, they say, would
show a broad black border of feathers, which isn't seen in the image
from the video. They also point out that the flying bird in the video
shows a significantly greater wingbeat frequency than is normal for a
Pileated Woodpecker but matches the known wingbeat frequency for the Ivory-billed Woodpecker.
Despite the divergent viewpoints on how the Luneau video should
be interpreted, all parties agree that it is vital to
continue the conservation efforts begun in Arkansas, to restore habitat
that is essential not only to the ivory-bill but to the many other species that
rely on this unique ecosystem. Read more in the Cornell Chronicle.
Click on the links below to read either the abstracts or full text of the articles published in Science. These links are provided courtesy of Science magazine.
Comment on "Ivory-billed Woodpecker (Campephilus principalis) Persists in Continential North America," by David A. Sibley, Louis R. Bevier, Michael A. Patten, and Chris S. ElphickAbstract
Full text
Response to Comment on "Ivory-billed Woodpecker (Campephilus principalis) Persists in Continental North America," by John W. Fitzpatrick, Martjan Lammertink, M. David Luneau, Jr., Tim W. Gallagher, and Kenneth V. Rosenberg
