Table 2 of Global Perspectives on Neotropical Migrant Conservation in the Northeast

Table 2. Relative importance of 44 state/physiographic area units in the Northeast. Regional importance is based on atlas-block concentrations of high-priority species (see Table 1). Conservation concern is based on atlas-block concentrations of priority species that show declining population trend (see Methods).

State / physiographic area	Area importance score	Area concern score
28 - New Hampshire	100	5
27 - Connecticut	87	38
21 - West Virginia	86	100
24 - Maryland	85	76
27 - Vermont	83	24
12 - New York	82	52
13 - Maryland	81	66
27 - New Hampshire	80	12
22 - West Virginia	80	61
28 - Vermont	76	7
12 - Connecticut	75	24
28 - Maine	73	5
24 - West Virginia	73	39
27 - Massachusetts	73	15
13 - West Virginia	71	43
12 - Maine	71	7
23 - Virginia	71	23
27 - New York	70	24
10 - Maryland	70	22
24 - New York	70	42
27 - Maine	70	7
22 - Pennsylvania	68	68
18 - Vermont	67	19
24 - Pennsylvania	66	37
13 - Pennsylvania	66	36
26 - New York	65	4
13 - Virginia	64	31
13 - New York	64	29
21 - Virginia	64	34
10 - Virginia	63	16
4 - Maryland	62	17
4 - Delaware	62	14
12 - Pennsylvania	58	13
16 - New York	57	37
11 - Virginia	55	11
10 - Pennsylvania	53	10
18 - New York	53	15
12 - Rhode Island	51	8
12 - Massachusetts	51	9
9 - New York	44	4
4 - Virginia	40	6
3 - Virginia	33	4
4 - Pennsylvania	32	5
9 - Massachusetts	32	2

BACK